70,500
500
2

One of the top 100 newspapers in the US will cease newsstand distribution by the end of the year

"Top 100 newspapers in the US"

InfoWorld just sent out its last print issue (it will still publish to the web) and there are rumors that the San Francisco Chronicle is in trouble. Will print become too expensive to support distribution to newsstands and kiosks? Will any one of these papers be only available only via a subscription? A "yes" bet says that one of the 100 will only be available via subscription or the paper will shutdown entirely. A "no" bet says that all 100 papers will still be available on newsstands on 12/31/07.

Yes
No
Settlement Details
Settlement choice: Draw.
Question Details
Created On: 4/4/07 at 11:41am (822 days ago)
Closes On: 12/31/07 at 11:59pm (550 days ago)
Settles On: 1/7/08 at 11:59pm (543 days ago)
Topic: Business
Type:
Bookmark: AddThis Social Bookmark Button
URL:
Embed:
Share Bet: Share this bet on MySpace Share this bet on Bebo Share this bet on Facebook Share this bet on Friendster Share this bet on Tagged
Comments
Login or Join for free to comment on this question.
House
House wrote 444 days ago
Hi,

Since the creator has failed to settle this outcome-based bet, I am settling it as a draw.

BluBet Admin
poetess1968
poetess1968 wrote 550 days ago
Yes
lileth
lileth wrote 633 days ago
yes
iankennedy
iankennedy (Creator) wrote 766 days ago
SF Chronicle lays of 100 journalists

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2007/05/29/EDGFKQ20N61.DTL
Caroline Rodgers
Caroline Rodgers wrote 799 days ago
It is inevitable for a number of reasons: the cost of printing and distributing the paper product, the ability to keep the online versions constantly updated, the steady shift in the amount of time people spend online, to name only three. Once computers and TV merge and the written word gives way to more and more video clips, any printed newspapers that remain will be throwbacks for wealthy old-world nostalgics.
iankennedy
iankennedy (Creator) wrote 800 days ago
Arthur Sulzberger, Publisher of the NY Times recently quoted

"I really don't know whether we'll be printing the Times in five years, and you know what? I don't care either."

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/822775.html
chudson
chudson wrote 807 days ago
This is a great bet. I have to believe there is at least 1 of the top 100 will at least run this experiment to see if it's a way to stave off the inevitable.
rpaulh
rpaulh wrote 817 days ago
yes, only b/c a larger shakeup is coming. it's hard to bet on this b/c of all the consolidation so far. so it's a good questions, but 1 of 100? i bet yes b/c the examiner strategy is working as a roll-up across metro areas. something similar is in stock, at least a name change!
spirit
spirit wrote 820 days ago
each of the top 100 newspapers should have enough circulation to generate positive cashflow to invest in online media or more localized editorial resource. if any of the 100 fall, it'd be the low circ or poorly managed ones. aside from the dismal growth story the newspaper business has attractive fundamentals.
daveschappell
daveschappell wrote 821 days ago
I think this one's a sure thing... double or nothin'?
kevin
kevin wrote 821 days ago
the weakest newspapers have the weakest online traffic (e.g. SF Chronicle). Therefore they have no options if they cease print distribution - i bet they make it another 9 months before collapsing...
song
song wrote 821 days ago
I bet more than one will be out of printed business. I wonder if top 100 from 2005 stayed in circulation 2006...
Flag

Tell us why this bet is inappropriate




Creator
User rating (1.0 from 1 rating)
Odds
141 Players (Viewed 1,280 times)
Yes  - 89.36% (126 players)
126 players
No  - 10.64% (15 players)
15 players
Related Stuff
Players